top of page

Professional Group

Public·9 members

Biometrics Attendance System For Mac

In the meantime please read our Biometric News Blog Biometrics are automated methods of recognizing a person based on a physiological or behavioral characteristic. Among the features measured are; face, fingerprints, hand geometry, handwriting, iris, retinal, vein, and voice. Biometric technologies are becoming the foundation of an extensive array of highly secure identification and personal verification solutions. As the level of security breaches and transaction fraud increases, the need for highly secure identification and personal verification technologies is becoming apparent. Biometric-based solutions are able to provide for confidential financial transactions and personal data privacy. The need for biometrics can be found in federal, state and local governments, in the military, and in commercial applications. Enterprise-wide network security infrastructures, government IDs, secure electronic banking, investing and other financial transactions, retail sales, law enforcement, and health and social services are already benefiting from these technologies.Biometric-based authentication applications include workstation, network, and domain access, single sign-on, application logon, data protection, remote access to resources, transaction security and Web security. Trust in these electronic transactions is essential to the healthy growth of the global economy. Utilized alone or integrated with other technologies such as smart cards, encryption keys and digital signatures, biometrics are set to pervade nearly all aspects of the economy and our daily lives. Utilizing biometrics for personal authentication is becoming convenient and considerably more accurate than current methods (such as the utilization of passwords or PINs). This is because biometrics links the event to a particular individual (a password or token may be used by someone other than the authorized user), is convenient (nothing to carry or remember), accurate (it provides for positive authentication), can provide an audit trail and is becoming socially acceptable and cost effective. More information about biometrics, standards activities, government and industry organizations and research initiatives on biometrics can be found through out this website.Untitled 1.style1 font-weight: bold;font-size: 10pt;Introduction to How Fingerprint Scanners Work

Biometrics Attendance System For Mac

Fingerprint scanning is a common phenomenon. Fingerprint technology is now on your personal computers/laptops, phones, tablets, door locks, and even on cars. Regardless of the widespread deployment of fingerprint biometrics, the underlying technology is still confusing for a layman. Despite the extensive use of fingerprint recognition technology in all different kinds of applications, most people do not quite understand how they work, even those who use them on a daily basis.

Standalone biometric fingerprint solutions serving a specific purpose (fingerprint scanner embedded such as fingerprint-based employee time & attendance systems, access control systems, fingerprint locks, etc.) generally come with inbuilt storage capacity. This storage capacity generally ranges from a few hundred to a few thousand fingerprints. Large-scale identification systems such as AFIS can store billions of fingerprints in storage servers.

When a matching request is generated, the system acquires a fresh sample from the user and sends it to the matching algorithm to compare if the sample matches with what is on record. If the sample matches the stored template, access is granted otherwise it is denied.

Before making any biometric fingerprint solutions work for you, you need to enroll the target users on the systems so that it recognizes their fingerprints whenever they need to perform identification/authentication. In the process of enrollment, user fingerprints are scanned to create a template, which is stored in the system.

Though our fingerprints are unique, they do not carry any demographic information such as name, age, employee ID, social security number, etc. So during the enrollment process, the user fingerprint captured is linked with the user demographics. For example, your employer enrolling you on an employee time & attendance system may associate your fingerprints with your employee ID.

While DNA profiling is extremely accurate to tell people apart, fingerprint recognition offers a more practical approach in day-to-day biometric applications such as time & attendance, access control, authentication, etc.

Before hitting the market, fingerprint solutions as well as other biometric systems go through rigorous testing and performance evaluation. This performance evaluation is done to ascertain that any performance deviations can be found and fixed.

To measure the performance of a biometric system, solution, or application; performance metrics are commonly used by manufacturers and equipment testers. Different metrics can be used for this purpose. The most common performance metrics are the FAR (false acceptance rate) and the FRR (false rejection rate).

FAR is the number of incidents (generally expressed in percentage) in which a biometric system will fallaciously grant access to an unauthorized individual. On the other hand, FRR is the number of incidents in which a biometric system will fallaciously deny access to an authorized person.

Modality-wise, biometric fingerprint solutions unarguably offer the widest range of devices and stand-alone systems. There are plug-and-play USB fingerprint scanners to highly sophisticated (and expensive) 10-print scanners. The size of fingerprint readers also ranges from tiny mobile and payment card readers to large ten fingerprint scanners. However, it is not just the size of the fingerprint devices that offer this kind of range.

Today, most systems require minimum password complexity with numbers and special characters. This enhances security but renders passwords hard to remember. Fingerprint-based user authentication eliminates these issues. The fingerprint is like a complex secret code engraved on your finger and is extremely hard to replicate by others. So yes, the fingerprint is safer than a password.

Alcohol-based sanitizers might affect the moisture level of your finger skin, which in turn may have a slight impact on the performance of your recognition system. However, there is not going to be any dramatic difference in performance as finger skin re-moisturizes itself fairly quickly. It also depends on the type of sensing technology used in your scanner.

Experts and ethical hackers have demonstrated fooling fingerprint scanners, face recognition systems, etc. on phones and computers. However, as the technology advances, manufacturers have started leveraging advanced anti-spoofing methods, which are extremely hard to circumvent. A cheap entry-level fingerprint might be vulnerable to spoofing, however, most fingerprint scanners with anti-spoofing will make spoofing attempts futile.

Jibble has changed the way we calibrate pricing in our business as we now have clarity in measuring KPIs. Jibble's time management software made it possible to compare work carried out by team members and identify bottlenecks and where systems needed improvement. Jibble made tracking staff time a breeze.

For the price and functionality, this is hands-down the best face recognition biometric attendance system. We would probably still use it even if it did not have the bio and geo functionality. Who can complain about the price?

Wonderful time management software. This has been a lovely experience right from the start. Simple-to-understand set-up, lots of personal support on hand, a useful 'onboarding' session to explore features and help me with exports. We needed a system for tracking consultants' time in contracts broken down by tasks. Jibble is the solution and frankly, no other software that I looked at got even close in terms of ease of use and price.

A number of time attendance systems with security schemes for avoiding impersonation or spoofing have been proposed for different purposes. Most security schemes deploy biometrics, such as the real-time face detection-based approach (Kuang & Baul, 2020; Mady & Hilles, 2017; Srivastava et al., 2020; Shrestha et al., 2018; Kumar et al., 2020; Yusof et al., 2018) and fingerprints (Thejaswini et al., 2021; Hasan et al., 2020). Moreover, a number of studies have suggested hardware-based authentications as something you have such as RFID (Putrada & Abdurohman, 2020; Maramis & Rompas, 2018), Near-Field Communication (NFC) (Oo et al., 2018), and wireless sensor networks (Alassery, 2019), while location-based services for area restrictions have been used to track employees (Fatkharrofiqi et al., 2020) and students (Ding, Cao & Zhu, 2018). In terms of multi-factor attendance systems, a two-factor system using RFID and face identification has been implemented for employees (Kurniawan & Zaky, 2020). Another two-factor participant time attendance system deployed QR code identity and face verification as a contactless method during the COVID-19 situation (Pichetjamroen et al., 2021). A multi-factor method for student attendance uses face recognition with two different somewhere you are factors, including GPS and QR code (a student uses his/her mobile device to scan a QR code provided by a lecturer in a physical classroom) (Yazid et al., 2019). A multi-modal attendance tracking system uses three different somewhere you are factors, including GPS, WiFi location, and Wireless Local-Area Network (WLAN) location along with consideration of reliability aspects, such as the number of Bluetooth devices around the user and the sojourn time within a designated area (Liu et al., 2020). Despite the use of three location tracking methods plus two additional features, this scheme could be designated a single-factor method (somewhere you are) based on the classical factors. It can be seen that the majority of these schemes above use only a single factor, and there is little literature on multi-factor time attendance systems. The drawback of single factor is linked to the high possibility of impersonation, whereas the implementation of a multi-factor system is hardly usable despite higher security.

  • About

    Welcome to the group! You can connect with other members, ge...

    Group Page: Groups_SingleGroup
    bottom of page